 |
| Soxs relaxing! |
Today’s blog story was inspired by
a friend who purchased a plastic cat figurine thinking that the attached “cat
fur” was made of synthetic material.
Turned out it was not fake fur, but real cat fur.
Our friend, who is a huge cat lover, was devastated
to learn that she purchased a figurine, made in China, that contained fur from an
animal that she loves dearly— a white domestic cat.
She wanted to share her experience with others so no one else would not
inadvertently purchase items made of dog or cat fur.
The following information
provided (in part) was written by Jean C. Yasuhara, Cruella De Vil Revisited:
The International Dog and Cat Fur Trade, 22 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev.
403 (2000) and gives a good foundation of this type of fur trade.
Even though this article was
written twelve years ago, we are sad to report that dogs and cats are still
used in the illegal cat and fur trade—right here in the United States. There are no graphic pictures or detailed
information in this blog posting as we did not want to upset families reading
this article; we simply want folks to know, without the added shock value that
pictures may present, about this horrible practice so that we can all do our part to put these people who
trade in dog and cat fur out of business—permanently!
"CRUELLA DE VIL" REVISITED: THE INTERNATIONAL
DOG AND CAT FUR TRADE
Children, both in the United States and worldwide, love
Walt Disney movies, which always end "happily ever after." One such film
is
101 Dalmatians, an animated classic that tells the story of an evil
woman named Cruella De Vii who wants to use the fur of cute Dalmatian puppies
to make a coat for herself.
1 She hires henchmen
to steal the puppies from their owners in the city with the intent to butcher
the frightened animals for their soft, spotted fur.
2
In the end, the puppies are saved
from gruesome deaths and return to a loving home.
3
The film's plot is based on the assumption that most
people cherish their animal companions and would be horrified to learn that
anyone would consider wearing a pet as a fur coat. Perhaps this explains why
Cruella De Vii is so villainous -she showed no emotion for the puppies-her
ultimate goal was to skin them.4
Her barbaric scheme seems unbelievable. Moviegoers are
relieved when Cruella De Vii fails because most can relate to the Dalmatians'
owners, who celebrate their pets' return. Viewers find comfort in the fact that
Cruella is a fictional character; most could not imagine that she is alive and
well today. Although fictional, this Disney film resembles reality in various
ways.
In reality, some believe Cruella De Vil's cold mentality and
heartlessness lives on in the current international dog and cat fur trade. The
issue came to the U.S. public's attention in late 1998, when the Humane Society
of the United States (HSUS) released the results of an intensive investigation concerning
the international dog and cat fur trade conducted by nine agents over the
course of eighteen months.5 Although the investigation concentrated on China,
Thailand, and the investigation concentrated on China, Thailand, and the Philippines,
6 the global ramifications of dog and cat fur
trade practices surfaced when Burlington Coat Factory, a nationwide retail
chain, unknowingly sold men's jackets with dog-fur trim.
7
In the Burlington scandal, stores sold approximately one hundred
dog-fur jackets to consumers before pulling the remaining inventory from stores
immediately after HSUS informed the company of the fur's actual source.8 Burlington executives told CNN that
they believed the fur was from coyotes when Burlington purchased the coats from
its vendor.9 In reality, no one at Burlington
bothered to check the jackets' labels, which claimed that the fur was
"Mongolian Dog Fur."10 AG-GEN
Labs in Davis, California, conducted DNA tests on a sample of the
fur trim to scientifically confirm the HSUS investigators' belief that
the coats were made with domestic dog fur.11
The news of the dog-fur jackets upset the public and hurt Burlington's
reputation as a retail outfitter.12
In less notorious instances, items made from dog or cat
fur sell cheaply in discount outlets and small dealers' kiosks.13 In San Diego, California, for example, swap
meet visitors noted that some small cat figurine toys seemed very realistic;
the San Diego Humane Society also noticed the similarity.14 A concerned
citizen complained that the items did not seem like rabbit fur, as the vendors claimed,
because of the distinct coloration of the cat fur.15
After an investigation, law
enforcement cited vendors Mario James and Tran Hung for violating state laws
prohibiting the possession or sale of cat or dog pelts.16 Unfortunately for the unwitting public, Mr. James disclosed
that he bought the cat figurines from a business in Los Angeles and sold over
one hundred of them at the swap meet over a three-month period.17
Although seemingly hypocritical, many U.S. citizens do not
take issue with using certain animals (e.g., cows, pigs, sheep, etc.) for food
or materials. Also, many subscribe to cultural beliefs when accepting the use
of certain fur-bearing animals (e.g., foxes, mink, etc.) for glamorized,
high-priced fur coats.22 Although recent
anti-dog and cat fur legislation 23 represents
a timely response to the global situation, and certainly deserves commendation,
the reasons underlying the demand for fur remain unaddressed.
The economic theory of supply and demand for fur products in
general explains the dog and cat fur trade's success.24 Until society views all fur commodities as products of
animal cruelty and with the same abhorrence it projects towards dog and cat fur
items, countries like China will have economic incentive to provide the
sought-after fur in the most profitable manner. Dogs and cats will continue to
be slaughtered for their fur as long as people in the United States and other
nations desire fur items.
For the complete text, please click
HERE.
There is graphic content found at this link.
Keep in mind, it is illegal in
the United States to import, export, distribute, transport, manufacture or sell
products containing dog or cat fur in the United States. As of November 9,
2000, the Dog and Cat Protection Act of 2000 calls for the seizure and
forfeiture of each item containing dog or cat fur.
The Act provides that any person
who violates any provision may be assessed a civil penalty of not more than
$10,000 for each separate knowing and intentional violation, $5,000 for each
separate gross negligent violation, or $3,000 for each separate negligent
violation.
International laws are diverse in
strength, but some are much stronger than U.S. federal and state laws. China
has virtually no regulations to protect fur animals. However, a few countries
have strictly regulated or completely banned fur farms. Italy, France, Denmark,
Greece, Belgium, Switzerland and Australia banned this trade and over 60
countries have banned certain types of traps, and some countries have labeling
laws.
Despite the Dog and Cat Protection Act of 2000,
illegal products containing dog or cat fur still makes its way into the
US.
“
Following a two-year investigation, The Humane Society of the United States
[revealed] that a New York City business, Unique Product Enterprises, advertised
and sold numerous products containing “dog fur” in apparent violation of
federal law.
The
HSUS referred the matter to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, which opened
its own investigation that resulted in the removal of advertisements for the products
from the company’s website.”
To
read the July 18, 2012 HSUS Investigation into the illegal use of dog fur in
apparel and other items, click HERE.
While the majority of our blog
postings are upbeat and inspirational, we felt a duty to share this information
with you so you can make educated decisions on whether or not to purchase items
made with dog or cat fur. We hope you found this information helpful and look
forward to any feedback you’d like to share with our readers.
Article References
1. See 101 DALMATIANS (Walt Disney Studios
1961).
2. See id.
3. See id.
4. See id.
5. See Domestic Pets Slaughtered for Fur (last
modified Dec. 15, 1998)
6. See id.
7. See Burlington Coat Factory Says It Was Misled by
Garment Supplier (last
modified Dec. 15, 1998) <http://cnnfn.com/1998112115/companies/coats>.
8. See Melanie Burney, Burlington Coat Factory Pulls
Dog-Fur Parkas from Stores,
BOSTON GLOBE, Dec. 16, 1998, at C5 (stating that
the coats were made of fur from dogs
slaughtered in China).
9. See Burlington Coat Factory Says It Was Misled by
Garment Supplier, supra note
10. Dateline NBC: Victims of Fashion (NBC
television broadcast, Dec. 15, 1998)
(transcript on file with the Loyola of Los Angeles
International & Comparative Law
Review) (explaining that Burlington bought the
parkas from Acme International, an
importer, who purchased the parkas from a Chinese
supplier).
11. See id.
12. See Burlington Coat Factory Says It Was Misled by
Garment Supplier, supra note 7
(noting that shares of Burlington stock closed down 13/16
on December 15, 1998).
13. See David Nitkin, Fur Shame; Humane Society
Alerts Public to Use of Dog and
Cat Pelts, SUN-SENTINEL (Ft. Lauderdale), Feb. 27,
1999, available in LEXIS, News
Library, Curnws File. See also HSUS Undercover
Investigation Determines American
Retailers Are Selling Dog and Cat Fur Products, HSUS
NEWS RELEASE, Dec. 13, 1999 (on
file with the Loyola of Los Angeles International &
Comparative Law Review) [hereinafter
HSUS Undercover Investigation] (mentioning that the
figurines, manufactured primarily
by Shangdong Heze Prefecture Import and Export Corporation
in China, sell for twentyfive
to thirty-five U.S. dollars).
[Vol. 22:403
International Dog and Cat Fur Trade
